SOURCE: http://torear.blogspot.com/2011/03/sobre-la-necesidad-del-tercer-puyazo.html
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9OcGkCC8zdlF-HxGEDI1c_98NQUt0xETjqZZIjpKwrsxGY-3Bmjmb0Z5r8IqJPzt4-FI9X46VdZ4KA2mYKrlzKMeEoQ5IoN8F2D4cDCTW1AOI7jw3DHU4IdemQrubIoSpzbDGc4nJ8iQ/s1600/2.jpg)
Usually the first jab at the bulls are well taken, and if that was the only one-third, all seem brave. In the second and beginning to show signs of its kind of bravery. And the third is where truth is defined if the bull is brave or not.
"In the third jab almost all bulls sing the chicken - they say. So
fundamental being the third beam, the three Shiv are essential to know the bravery of the bull and the farmer to make its selection sufficiently informed. Yes, since the party is party, had consented to the third beam could conclude with three Shiv, two, one or none, the bull would not come down to us, lost their caste in contradictory crosses without any possibility of selecting in purity. "
Joaquín Vidal (The Bullfight is Greatness)
Note: Should not be required, the least squares first, this third jab?
0 comments:
Post a Comment